Intensity Over Individuality?

Hello and welcome back! After a short break, we’re here again—with a question that never fails to spark heated debates among football fans: Has football changed for the better or worse in recent years? Was the game truly more attractive in the past?

In this article, we take a closer look at the developments of the last ten years and analyze how tactics, athleticism, and playing styles have evolved. Enjoy the read!

⚽Intensity Over Individuality?

At its core, football remains the same—a game with a ball, two goals, two goalkeepers, and twenty outfield players. But a closer look reveals a profound transformation that has taken place over the past ten to twenty years. It’s as if the familiar framework of the game has been preserved while gradually being infused with new, intense dynamics.

Right from the outset, it becomes clear that the physical demands on players have changed drastically. While the average distance covered per game was around 10,679 meters in 2007, today’s footballers run nearly 10,881 meters. This difference may seem minor at first glance—but what truly stands out is how these distances are covered. The intensity has increased significantly:

The distance covered at high speeds (over 19.8 km/h) has increased from 890 to 1,152 meters per game—a rise of over 29%. Likewise, the number of sprints has nearly doubled, from an average of 26 to 57 per match. These developments have made modern football not only faster but also more physically demanding than ever before.

But the transformation isn’t limited to the physical aspects. Tactically, the game has evolved as well—not through the invention of an entirely new style, but rather through the refinement and adaptation of existing concepts. The ideas of legends like Cruyff or Sacchi still form the foundation, but they are now being reinterpreted in response to the game's increasing physical demands.

Modern football places a strong emphasis on transition moments: the shift from defense to attack (and vice versa) has become the decisive phase in which a single moment can determine the difference between victory and defeat.

Coaches today not only strategize their attacking play but also anticipate potential ball losses and the dangerous transition moments that follow. It is not uncommon for a team to strike with full force during these transitions, punishing the opponent—an essential tactical aspect that heavily influences modern football.

At the same time, the "playable space" on the pitch has significantly decreased. While the game was more open and the spaces were more generous ten years ago, today's focus is on minimizing the gaps as much as possible. The goal: to deny the opponent the creative spaces where playmakers can thrive.

The changing spaces on the pitch have also influenced how creativity is perceived in football. Many fans miss the classic, eye-catching dribbles and spectacular individual plays of the past. However, creativity has not disappeared—it has simply become more subtle. In a game defined by tight spaces and high speed, creativity is often expressed through quick decision-making, intelligent positional shifts, and precise passing. It’s the fine details—often unnoticed by the casual viewer—that can ultimately determine victory or defeat.

Another crucial aspect of modern football that has gained increasing importance in recent decades is the rise in the number of matches. Ten or twenty years ago, a top team would typically play around 50 to 55 games per season. Today, with international tournaments, domestic cups, and demanding league schedules, elite clubs often compete in 60 to 70 or even more matches per season. These congested schedules, where games are played every three days at the highest level, present new challenges—both physically and mentally. Players must cope with shorter recovery times and a higher risk of injury, while coaches rely on smart rotation strategies and advanced data analysis to manage workload. At the same time, balancing peak performance with maintaining creative impulses has become increasingly difficult, which can ultimately impact the overall quality of the game.

Youth development systems have also adapted to these changes. In academies, the focus is no longer solely on free play; today, discipline, predefined routines, and physical fitness take precedence. Young players are taught to operate within a structured environment from the start, which is advantageous in a modern game where every mistake can be costly. However, there is a risk that this emphasis may undermine the ability to make instinctive decisions and express individual creative impulses, which was more strongly encouraged in the past.

A particularly controversial topic is the influence of coaches like Pep Guardiola. Critics accuse him of making football "measured" and lacking in creativity with his highly systematized approach. However, a closer look reveals that Guardiola is far from stifling the creative spirit of the game. He built on the visionary ideas of Cruyff and adapted them to meet modern demands. His approach combines discipline and structure with the necessary freedom in crucial moments—freedom that allowed players like Lionel Messi to shine. Under Guardiola, creative moments flourished precisely when they were most needed, even though the overall style of play appeared highly systematic.

Guardiola is often accused of playing boring football or of having many teams try to replicate his style. However, the reality is that it’s not up to him how other coaches set up their teams. Every coach is responsible for their own team and must decide for themselves whether it makes sense to follow a similar philosophy. While Guardiola's style has certainly inspired many, football is not a formula that can simply be copied—especially not one-to-one.

A key difference is that Guardiola prefers technically skilled players who can function within his complex positional play. However, even he cannot escape the evolution of modern football. The physical demands have increased significantly in recent years, meaning even possession-based teams like his can no longer rely solely on playing dominance. Today, dynamics, athleticism, and intensity are just as crucial—a shift clearly demonstrated by teams like Liverpool or other physically strong sides.

Another point is the way opposing teams approach him. Many teams consciously choose to defend deep and wait for counter-attacks—an understandable strategy to avoid falling into the trap of a team that circulates the ball well. However, this tactic also influences the way Guardiola’s game unfolds. When attacking against a deep block, there is inevitably less space, requiring a more patient style of play with no room for hasty turnovers. While this can appear less exciting to spectators, it is often tactically unavoidable.

In the end, both sides are focused on finding the right balance between risk and security. While fans desire an exciting spectacle, coaches are primarily concerned with organizing their team in the best possible way and minimizing mistakes. Attractive football is not solely created through an offensive philosophy—it also requires opponents who are willing to engage. And in an era where every detail is analyzed and every weakness ruthlessly exploited, this is becoming increasingly rare.

Overall, it is clear that football has not fundamentally changed over the past ten to twenty years—instead, it has been intensified and refined in many areas. Physical demands have increased, the game has become faster, and tactically more challenging. Creativity has transformed: it is less obvious, but no less important. The art now lies in creating those fine, game-changing moments within a tightly structured framework, which is what makes modern football so fascinating.

Check out our Homepage for exclusive training videos and products.

Was this post forwarded to you? Subscribe here.

Have an idea or feedback to share? [email protected]